Define quip code#
I looked in the code for Quip-Based Conversation, and noticed that it already had the command to include Reactable Quips, so I suspected that the problem might be that Reactable Quips was somehow getting included twice, and so quip_null was getting defined twice. Obviously you yourself weren’t defining quip_null twice, so the problem was something to do with the extensions. Juhana has more experience than I do, but the first error message you got indicated that something had gone wrong with the definition of “quip,” and the second one sounded like the sort of thing that happens if you try to define quip_null twice. I have been programming for up to 50 years and this is the strangest language I have ever encountered. Now it is not so much these exact Extensions (straws and camels backs), but the whole language - I am getting to the point of not wanting to even try writing a new line of text when I know that what I will get back is not a functioning line or two but some obscure error messages. But I can’t do that: it already has a meaning (as an object). You wrote ‘The quips are defined by the Table of Quip Texts’, and one of the entries in the first column of that table is ‘quip_null’, which I ought to create as a new value of a quip. In Section 1 - Quips in the extension Reactable Quips by Michael Martin:
See the manual: 4.8 > New value properties You wrote ‘A person has a quip called a greeting’, but ‘quip’ is not the name of a kind of value which I know (such as ‘number’ or ‘text’). In Section 2 - Member fields and default values in the extension Quip-Based Conversation by Michael Martin: Sorry about the rant but this is my problem:
0 kommentar(er)
